Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff cannot rely merely on pleading allegations for Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss where personal jurisdiction is contested
• holding that a court “may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading 11 which are contradicted by affidavit”
• holding that 14 the facts alleged in the complaint are generally accepted as true unless contradicted by 15 affidavit
• holding that “where the 18 jurisdictional facts are enmeshed with the merits, the district court may decide that the plaintiff 19 should not be required in a Rule 12(d
• noting that it may be unreasonable to exercise jurisdiction where the effect in the forum state was caused by defendant’s negligent and not purposeful acts
• concluding that “where the jurisdictional facts are enmeshed with the merits,” the district court may decide that the plaintiff “should be required only to establish a prima facie showing of jurisdictional facts with affidavits and perhaps discovery materials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).