Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that acts in furtherance of conspiracy to restrain trade must take place within forum
• recognizing that “plaintiffs must allege ‘that the challenged restraint is not the result of independent actions by the defendants,’ but rather that ‘the defendants consciously committed to a common agreement of an unreasonable restraint on trade’ ” (citations omitted)
• finding that the government contacts exception extends “to non-resident contact with trade associations located [within] the District of Columbia.”
• recognizing a plaintiffs “burden of adequately alleging that a conspiracy to restrain trade existed in the first instance and that each defendant knowingly joined or agreed to participate in the conspiracy”
• plaintiffs’ generic use of “defendants” was inadequate to meet their burden of alleging that each defendant was a participant in the conspiracy
• travel to the District for the purpose of fulfilling membership obligations in non-profit founded to work for reform in medical education

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).