Skip to main content
· 2/25/1965

Roger Fandel v. Arabian American Oil Company, a Corporation

Citations

  • 345 F.2d 87
  • 120 U.S. App. D.C. 193
  • 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that contacts with the government of a sort “not ... customarily associated with strictly commercial operations” do not constitute “doing business” under the statute
  • excluding the government-related activities of a District of Columbia office from the jurisdictional analysis because they did not constitute “doing 2 business” under the long-arm statute
  • excluding the govern- ment-related activities of a District of Co- lumbia office from the jurisdictional analy- sis because they did not constitute “doing business” under the long-arm statute
  • finding no general jurisdiction where the purpose of defendant’s office in the District was to act as “its state department” regarding “the Middle East generally and Saudi Arabia in particular’’
  • “Washington presents many business organizations with special needs for a continuous and ponderable physical presence there, ... and that the purpose of Congress was not to make that presence in every case a base for the assertion of personal jurisdiction.”
  • government contacts exception applied where defendant maintained a fiveperson office in the District for purposes of handling diplomatic and regulatory issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burger, Wright, McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.