Skip to main content
· 2/7/1992

Richard T. Dorman v. Richard L. Thornburgh

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 57
  • 293 U.S. App. D.C. 364
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1430
  • 1992 WL 18287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the BOP did not exceed its authority in establishing the IFRP and that the program does not violate due process
  • stating that prison officials’ discretion to set terms and conditions of prison employment precludes the implication of a protected liberty interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Ginsburg, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.