Alaska Supreme Court· 4/22/2005

DeNardo v. Calista Corp.

Citations

111 P.3d 326
2005 Alas. LEXIS 53
95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1380
2005 WL 928147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“We have held that ‘the pleadings of pro se litigants should be held to less stringent standards than those of lawyers.’ ” (quoting Breck v. Ulmer, 745 P.2d 66, 75 (Alaska 1987))
\A pro se litigant's interpretation of his own complaint need not be determinative of what it actually pleads; the court must exercise its independent judgment in determining what claims the complaint's words assert.\
stipulation to dismiss with prejudice is final and on the merits
\[W]e consider a claim to be raised when the 'briefing was such that [the court] could discern [the party's] legal arguments and [the opposing party] could reply to them.' \ (second and third alterations in original
noting court's lenient interpretation of pro se litigant's pleadings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fare, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.