Byers v. Ovitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that superior court was within its discretion in imputing income based on estimated expenses where party had submitted varying and incomplete versions of tax returns
• affirming order imputing income based on party's estimated expenses when party was uncooperative and gave contradictory testimony
• noting “the importance of ‘tak[ing] all evidence necessary to accurately reflect the parties’ economic reality’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting Routh v. Andreassen, 19 P.3d 593, 595-96 (Alaska 2001))
• affirming imputation of income based on uncooperative party’s estimated expenses
• noting court may determine party's income by various means

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).