Skip to main content
· 7/19/1991

Klosterman v. Hickel Investment Co.

Citations

  • 821 P.2d 118
  • 1991 Alas. LEXIS 62
  • 1991 WL 132010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a landlord could engage in a self-help remedy in response to the tenant's nonpay ment of rent because the lease at issue \expressly permit[ted] the lessor to re-enter the property upon the lessee's failure to pay rent\
  • “Where a contract provision is unambiguous, we will ascertain the parties’ intention from the instrument itself.”
  • giving effect to parties' reasonable expectations when interpreting lease agreement
  • review of question of law is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.