Skip to main content

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 370 P.3d 1070
  • 2016 Alas. LEXIS 33
  • 2016 WL 1077088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that superior court erred in failing to address mother’s voluntary unemployment argument where father had retired at age 47 and mother clearly raised the argument in the superior court
  • \[W]e consider pro se pleadings liberally in an effort to determine what legal claims have been raised.\ (quoting Briggs v. City of Palmer , 333 P.3d 746 , 747 (Alaska 2014) )
  • \[W]e review matters that were not raised below and not listed in a statement of points on appeal for plain error.\ (quoting Laughlin v. Laughlin , 229 P.3d 1002 , 1005 (Alaska 2010) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers, Fabe, Winfree, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.