Cook v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The pleadings of pro se litigants are liberally construed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Molly O. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-03-14· cited 6×
• Cook v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 2014-05-05
• Peter Chapman v. Julia Chapman
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-02-14

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Neder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
• Sullivan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
• Wheat v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
• United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,863×
• Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 804×
• United States v. Monsanto
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 461×
• United States v. Roy W. Collins
  Tenth Circuit· 1990-11-27· cited 221×
• Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Molinaro
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-11-16· cited 179×
• Bell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1971-07-09· cited 122×
• State v. Paumier
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 115×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-06-28· cited 112×
• Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays International, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2004-10-05· cited 103×
• United States v. Peter Monsanto
  Second Circuit· 1991-04-04· cited 95×
• State v. Ellington
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-05-27· cited 86×
• McKinnon v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-08-30· cited 86×
• O'Link v. O'Link
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-07-31· cited 83×
• Adams v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2011-09-16· cited 79×
• United States v. Stein
  Second Circuit· 2008-08-28· cited 73×
• King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-26· cited 62×