Wessells v. State, Department of Highways

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying that rights of way are for road construction by stating that one could not \reasonably expect a right-of-way\ to be triangular in shape and that a \right-of-way may follow such route as is reasonably necessary for the [owner's] purposes\
• stating it is established rule of construction that \ambiguities are construed against the party that supplied and drafted the form\
• implying that rights of way are for road construction by stating that one could not \reasonably expect a right-of-way\ to be triangular in shape and that a \right-of-way may follow such route as is reasonably necessary for the [owner's] purposes\
• although grant of easement should be interpreted according to the reasonable expectation of the parties, it is not reasonable to think parties intended extensive destruction of the property.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).