Skip to main content
· 8/4/2006

In Re the Adoption of Erin G.

Citations

  • 140 P.3d 886
  • 2006 Alas. LEXIS 117
  • 2006 WL 2217487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 1914 challenge was subject to state statute of limitations
  • applying state statutes of limitations in an appeal from a state child adoption case involving Indian children
  • applying state statutes of limitations in an appeal from a state child adoption case involving Indian children
  • allowing untimely appeal when pro se litigant attempted to resolve confusion over court-appointed attorney
  • AS 25.23.140(b) requires that challenges to an adoption decree be brought within one year
  • Federal courts “borrow” 5 state limitations periods for claims similar to ICWA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.