· 8/4/2006
In Re the Adoption of Erin G.
Citations
- 140 P.3d 886
- 2006 Alas. LEXIS 117
- 2006 WL 2217487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that section 1914 challenge was subject to state statute of limitations
- applying state statutes of limitations in an appeal from a state child adoption case involving Indian children
- applying state statutes of limitations in an appeal from a state child adoption case involving Indian children
- allowing untimely appeal when pro se litigant attempted to resolve confusion over court-appointed attorney
- AS 25.23.140(b) requires that challenges to an adoption decree be brought within one year
- Federal courts “borrow” 5 state limitations periods for claims similar to ICWA claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.