Skip to main content

Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.

Citations

  • 204 P.3d 1001
  • 2009 Alas. LEXIS 42
  • 2009 WL 878367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that misrepresentation must be made by other party to contract
  • setting aside settlement agreement because Board failed to follow its own regulations about best interests of worker before approving settlement and held hearing in worker’s absence
  • setting out standard of review for findings of fact
  • rejecting argument that attorney’s threat of withdrawal constituted duress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.