Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 1/5/1998

DeJarnette v. Corning Inc.

Citations

  • 133 F.3d 293
  • 1998 WL 1335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pretext is not a vehicle for substituting the court’s judgment for that of the employer
  • explaining that a court’s role is not to determine whether the employer’s decision was wise, fair, or even correct, but whether it was a cover for unlawful discrimination
  • “Title VII is not a vehicle for substituting the judgment of a court for that of the employer.”
  • “[I]t is not our province to decide whether the reason was wise, fair, or even correct, ultimately, so long as it truly was the reason for the plaintiff’s termination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Niemeyer, Magill, Eighth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.