Anthony E. Jiminez v. Mary Washington College Philip Hall, Anthony E. Jiminez v. Mary Washington College Philip Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff must show that “both the reason [for her termination] was false, and that discrimination was the real reason [for her termination]”
• concluding that when employee is hired and fired by the same person, that is strong evidence that employer's reason for firing employee was not pretextual
• recognizing that a district court conclusion that is \contrary to the clear weight of the evidence considered in light of the entire record\ is clearly errone- ous
• explaining that the purpose of appeal is not to obtain a plenary trial
• explaining that district court clearly errs when it “disregard[s] substantial evidence that would militate a conclusion contrary to that reached”
• noting that plaintiff “must prove both that the reason [for the defendant’s actions] was false, and that discrimination was the real reason for the challenged conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).