Andrea E. Boyd v. Harding Academy of Memphis, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the district court’s conclusion that the defendant “articulated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason by stating that it fired plaintiff Boyd not because she was pregnant, but for engaging in sex outside of marriage”
• \Congress manifested its belief that discrimination based on pregnancy constitutes discrimination based on sex.\
• “Congress manifested its belief that discrimination on the basis of pregnancy constitutes discrimination based on sex.”
• “Title VII . . . applies . . . to a religious institution charged with sex discrimination.”
• “[Plaintiff] may satisfy this burden by showing that the…reasons…were not its true reasons, but were a pretext for intentional discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).