Skip to main content
· 12/11/2000

Glunt v. GES Exposition Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 123 F. Supp. 2d 847
  • 6 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1041
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18134
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,343
  • 2000 WL 1844732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “prima facie test might vary somewhat depending on the context of the claim and the nature of the adverse employment action alleged”
  • concerning a period of one month between the adverse action and protected activity
  • summary judgment denied in part where pregnant plaintiff was demoted with corresponding decrease in salary
  • “poor job performance qualifies as a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason to demote an employee”
  • “Temporal proximity between the employer’s adverse employment action and the employee’s exercise of her rights under the FMLA may reasonably support an inference that the action was taken in violation of the FMLA.”
  • discouraging employee’s use of FMLA leave is form of interference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.