Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 771 N.E.2d 647
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 605
  • 2002 WL 1644600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Post-Conviction Rule 2(1) did not permit the belated appeal of a defendant's motion to correct erroneous sentence, which was considered as a petition for post-conviction relief
  • holding that the Court of Appeals lacks subject matter jurisdiction over untimely appeals
  • relying on Greer and dismissing an untimely direct appeal “for lack of subject matter jurisdiction”
  • “P-C.R. 2(1) does not permit belated appeals of motions to correct erroneous sentences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.