Skip to main content
· 9/25/2014

In the Matter of the Adoption of O.R., N.R. v. K.G. and C.G.

Citations

  • 16 N.E.3d 965
  • 2014 Ind. LEXIS 778
  • 2014 WL 4783378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that incarcerated father failed without justifiable cause to communicate significantly with his daughter by calling her only once in six years and not attempting mail communication with her through the adoptive parents or the court
  • holding that the Court would Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 70A01-1408-DR-332 | March 19, 2015 Page 8 of 19 address the appeal of a termination of parental rights despite the parent’s untimely notice of appeal
  • holding appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal forfeited for failure to file a timely notice of appeal
  • stating that a party’s filing of an untimely notice of appeal does not “deprive the appellate courts of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal”
  • providing that the trial judge is in the best position to judge the facts and determine witness credibility
  • explaining that appellant who procedurally forfeits his or her right to an appeal may have that right restored where there are “extraordinarily compelling reasons” to address the appeal on its merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Rush, Dickson, David, Massa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.