Skip to main content

Mills v. State

Citations

  • 868 N.E.2d 446
  • 2007 Ind. LEXIS 473
  • 2007 WL 1791225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant “relinquished the right to challenge” on direct appeal “his sentence as an impermissible double enhancement” because it was “imposed pursuant to a plea agreement” with “favorable outcomes” for him
  • holding that “Indiana Code § 35-35-1-4 permits an individual to move to withdraw a guilty plea before sentence. If a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is denied and the individual wishes to contest the trial court’s decision, a direct appeal is the proper appellate procedure”
  • “Surely, at the time of this trial and initial appeal, Jones could not have known about, nor had available to him, a case not yet decided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.