Skip to main content

Hayes v. State

Citations

  • 906 N.E.2d 819
  • 2009 Ind. LEXIS 462
  • 2009 WL 1409479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a conviction based upon a guilty plea may not be challenged on direct appeal and must be done by filing a petition for post-conviction relief
  • observing that the defendant submitted an “open” guilty plea and holding that “he did not (and under Tumulty v. State, [666 N.E.2d 394 (Ind. 1996),] could not), appeal his convictions”
  • noting that, under Tumulty v. State, Hayes could not have directly appealed his conviction because he pled guilty, and holding the Court of Appeals acted contrary to Tumulty when it reversed Hayes’s conviction sua sponte
  • observing that the defendant submitted an “open” guilty plea and holding that “he did not (and under Tumulty v. State, [666 N.E.2d 394 (Ind. 1996),] could Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 23A-CR-739 | October 10, 2023 Page 8 of 15 not), appeal his convictions”
  • a reversal of a conviction on direct appeal due to a guilty plea having an inadequate factual basis is “contrary to [its] precedent in Tumulty[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.