Skip to main content

Greer v. State

Citations

  • 685 N.E.2d 700
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 161
  • 1997 WL 661155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that belated appeal of denial of credit time following probation revocation is outside purview of rule
  • holding that Post-Conviction Rule 2(1) did not permit belated consideration of appeals from post-judgment petitions
  • holding that Post-Conviction Rule 2 was a vehicle for belated direct appeals alone and “provides a method for seeking permission for belated consideration of appeals addressing conviction, but does not permit belated consideration of appeals of other post-judgment petitions”
  • holding that Post- Conviction Rule 2 was a vehicle for belated direct appeals alone and “provides a method for seeking permission for belated consideration of appeals addressing conviction, but does not permit belated consideration of appeals of other post-judgment petitions”
  • \Due process does not mandate that probation revocation be treated the same as direct appeals; nor does it require that appeals be available on a belated basis.\
  • “Due process does not mandate that probation revocation be treated the same as direct appeals; nor does it require that appeals be available on a belated basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.