Indiana Supreme Court· 3/20/2001
Games v. State
Citations
- 743 N.E.2d 1132
- 2001 Ind. LEXIS 255
- 2001 WL 275202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant waived right to challenge his conviction on double jeopardy grounds
- providing that defendants “who plead guilty to achieve favorable outcomes in the process of bargaining give up a plethora of substantive claims and procedural rights”
- holding a defendant who enters a plea agreement to achieve an advantageous position must keep the bargain and cannot then challenge the sentence on double jeopardy grounds
- noting that “Games bargained for a sentence between sixty and 118 years in order to avoid the death penalty” and, accordingly, had “waived his right to challenge his sentence on double jeopardy grounds”
- explaining that a defendant who enters plea agreement to achieve advantageous position must Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A02-1701-CR-21 | December 6, 2017 Page 5 of 6 keep the bargain
- providing that a defendant “who enters a plea agreement to achieve an advantageous position must keep the bargain” and “[o]nce the defendant bargains for a reduced charge, he cannot then challenge the sentence on double jeopardy grounds”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Sullivan, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Creech v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-05-21· cited 108×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-21· cited 68×
- Thomas M. Kunberger v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-02· cited 57×
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 56×
- Mapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-28· cited 56×
- Douglas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 55×
- In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.T.Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 45×
- Schlichter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-12-18· cited 34×
- George v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-12-07· cited 9×
- Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-03-31· cited 9×
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-05-12· cited 7×
- House v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-24· cited 6×
- Travis Koontz v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-09· cited 6×
- Mays v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-06-30· cited 5×
- Kincaid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-11-12· cited 4×
- Woods v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-27· cited 3×
- Bunch v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-16· cited 3×
- Stites v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-29· cited 2×
- Richard Hawkins v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-07-03· cited 2×
- Ridner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-06-30· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
- Games v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 117×
- Martinez-Villareal v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 84×
- Sims v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-01-23· cited 70×
- Cherry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-07· cited 60×
- Games v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-14· cited 54×
- Lasley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-07-24· cited 37×
- Lutes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-03-17· cited 15×
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 14×
- Spivey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-04-30· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.