Skip to main content

Games v. State

Citations

  • 743 N.E.2d 1132
  • 2001 Ind. LEXIS 255
  • 2001 WL 275202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant waived right to challenge his conviction on double jeopardy grounds
  • providing that defendants “who plead guilty to achieve favorable outcomes in the process of bargaining give up a plethora of substantive claims and procedural rights”
  • holding a defendant who enters a plea agreement to achieve an advantageous position must keep the bargain and cannot then challenge the sentence on double jeopardy grounds
  • noting that “Games bargained for a sentence between sixty and 118 years in order to avoid the death penalty” and, accordingly, had “waived his right to challenge his sentence on double jeopardy grounds”
  • explaining that a defendant who enters plea agreement to achieve advantageous position must Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A02-1701-CR-21 | December 6, 2017 Page 5 of 6 keep the bargain
  • providing that a defendant “who enters a plea agreement to achieve an advantageous position must keep the bargain” and “[o]nce the defendant bargains for a reduced charge, he cannot then challenge the sentence on double jeopardy grounds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Sullivan, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.