Skip to main content

Ross v. State

Citations

  • 45 So. 3d 403
  • 2010 WL 2103971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a confession was involuntary when the police made the deliberate decision to delay the giving of the Miranda warnings until several hours into the custodial interrogation and the lengthy interrogation was conducted in a highly accusatory manner
  • explaining that Miranda warnings are required only when a suspect in custody faces interrogation
  • noting “I got to read this to you,” as part of discussion downplaying Miranda rights
  • finding questioning “highly confrontational and accusatorial,” and weighing in favor of custody fact that “[t]he detective repeatedly told Ross that he knew Ross committed the crime and the only question remaining was why”
  • finding questioning “highly confrontational and accusatorial,” and weighing in favor of custody fact that “[t]he detective repeatedly told Ross that he knew Ross committed the crime and the only question remaining was why”
  • “the government bears the burden of establishing that the delay in administering the Miranda warnings was not deliberate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince, Pariente, Lewis, Labarga, Polston, Canady, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.