Skip to main content

Roman v. State

Citations

  • 475 So. 2d 1228
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “police officers questioning a suspect in a noncustodial setting [were not required to] comply with an attorney’s request that - 45 - they cease questioning the suspect and then inform the suspect of the attorney’s call”
  • \That an interrogation takes place at a station house does not by itself transform an otherwise noncustodial interrogation into a custodial one.\
  • no requirement for Miranda warnings where suspect voluntarily accompanied investigators to the station house, was not handcuffed and was interrogated approximately three and one half hours prior to his confession
  • \That an interrogation takes place at a station house does not by itself transform an otherwise noncustodial interrogation into a custodial one.\ (citing Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 97 S.Ct. 711, 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977)) (emphasis supplied)
  • \some reasonable persons might assume they are not in custody unless told otherwise\
  • “[A]l- though we consider [the technique] as a factor among the totality of circumstances surrounding the giving of this statement ... we find that the deception was insufficient to make an otherwise voluntary statement inadmissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.