Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/27/2017

Darling v. State

Citations

158 A.3d 1065
232 Md. App. 430
2017 WL 1508669
2017 Md. App. LEXIS 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[O]nce a prima facie showing of authenticity is made, the ultimate question of authenticity is left to the jury.”
“[O]nce a prima facie showing of authenticity is made, the ultimate question of authenticity is left to the jury.”
“[T]he burden of proof for authentication is slight, and the court need not find that the evidence is necessarily what the proponent claims, but only that there is sufficient evidence that the jury ultimately might do so.”
“[T]he burden of proof for authentication is slight, and the court need not find that the evidence is necessarily what the proponent claims, but only that there is sufficient evidence that the jury ultimately might do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krauser, Berger, Geter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.