Skip to main content

Darling v. State

Citations

  • 81 So. 3d 574
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3132
  • 2012 WL 636305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the competent substantial evidence standard to review the trial court’s determination as to whether entitlement to immunity was proven by a preponderance of the evidence
  • “justification for using deadly force in self defense, which includes the ‘stand your ground’ defense, does not apply to a person who provokes the attack.”
  • on appeal of s. 776.032 statutory immunity determination, trial court’s findings of fact are presumed correct and will not be reversed if supported by competent substantial evidence
  • “[E]vidence that is inextricably intertwined with the crimes charged is admissible . . . where it is impossible to give a complete and intelligible account of the crime charged without referring to the other crime.”
  • reviewing the issue on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Rothenberg, Suarez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.