Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/29/2013

Commonwealth v. James

Citations

69 A.3d 180
620 Pa. 465
2013 WL 2360949
2013 Pa. LEXIS 1096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the Commonwealth’s appeal of a suppression order is proper when the Commonwealth certifies in good faith that the suppression order substantially handicaps its prosecution
pointing out that the jury acquitted Appellant of the charges of burglary and criminal trespass
holding an order of suppression was interlocutory not final such that 42 Pa.C.S. § 5505 did not apply and the trial court had authority to revisit the order and reach a different result beyond the thirty-day period for modifying an order provided by section 5505
Commonwealth’s appeal of suppression order proper where Commonwealth certifies in good faith that order substantially handicaps prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Consideration, Eakin, Former, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.