Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/16/1973

Commonwealth v. Hall

Citations

451 Pa. 201
302 A.2d 342
1973 Pa. LEXIS 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining the basis for this particularized focus by noting that a magistrate cannot make an objective and detached probable-cause determination if given “falsified averments”
explaining the basis for this particularized focus by noting that a magistrate cannot make an objective and [J-111-2016] - 6 detached probable-cause determination if given “falsified averments”
“Commentators have noted that further review of the affidavits supporting a warrant is necessary because of the ex parte, exigent circumstances of the initial issuance of the warrant.”
“if a magistrate is furnished, and reviews falsified averments, he is effectively precluded from making a detached and objective determination,” of probable cause
material misstatement, whether intentional or not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nex, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.