Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Saunders

Citations

  • 394 A.2d 522
  • 483 Pa. 29
  • 1978 Pa. LEXIS 1143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an issue involving this Court’s jurisdiction may be raised sua sponte
  • determining question of final order implicates jurisdiction, and finding no final order warranted quashal of appeal
  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court would entertain the Commonwealth’s appeal from an interlocutory order where the order effectively caused the termination of the prosecution's case or substantially impaired the presentation of its case.
  • considering the propriety of a federal Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.