Com. v. Skipper, G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]efore [a] defendant must prove [a] privacy interest in [an] area searched, [the] Commonwealth must initially satisfy its burden of production by presenting evidence showing [the] defendant lacked any protected privacy interest[.]” (emphasis omitted
• “[t]he Commonwealth waived its claim on appeal because it failed to meet its initial burden and, instead, conceded the expectation of privacy by focusing exclusively on the legality of the police conduct.” (citations omitted)
• same with respect to the Commonwealth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Com. v. Smith, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-16· cited 17×
• Com. v. Fulton, A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-09-19· cited 1×
• Com. v. Choice, K.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-09-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Enimpah, A.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 106×
• Commonwealth v. James
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-29· cited 99×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-29· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Santiago
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-10· cited 33×