Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gould

Citations

  • 187 A.3d 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an investigative detention commenced when parole agent parked his car behind defendant's vehicle, blocking it from moving, identified himself as a parole officer, and asked defendant to exit the vehicle
  • explaining that reasonable suspicion to search a parolee’s property is based on the totality of the evidence
  • stating that an appellant who raises an issue in his Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement but then presents no argument on the issue in his appellate brief has abandoned the issue
  • stating that a “parole officer’s warrantless search of a parolee will be deemed reasonable, and the fruits of the search will be admissible in court, if the totality of the evidence demonstrates: (1
  • rejecting “stalking horse” doctrine where, after being informed by police of defendant’s suspected drug activities parole agent, with police as backup, detained and searched defendant for suspected parole violations
  • holding parole agent had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant and search his person and vehicle, where police informed parole agent defendant was not residing at his designated residence, the defendant was seen in known high crime area, and the defendant had prior parole violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, McLaughlin, Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.