Commonwealth v. Estabrook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant has no standing to challenge law enforcement's acquisition of the CSLI of a person who is not a party to the appeal when there is no evidence that the defendant used that person's phone
• finding no attenuation between illegal CSLI search and defendant's statement because \there were no intervening circumstances between the police questions based on the CSLI and [defendant's] responses thereto\
• where defendant was confronted with evidence obtained from CSLI in close proximity to illegality, statements made in direct response must be suppressed
• defendants did not have standing to contest collection of CSLI associated with cell phones that they were not using
• where Commonwealth has complied with 18 U.S.C. § 2703, it may obtain up to six hours of person’s CSLI without search warrant
• Commonwealth met its burden under \independent source\ doctrine to show that CSLI search pursuant to warrant was untainted by prior warrantless search for same information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).