Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/19/2014

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

86 A.3d 771
624 Pa. 405
2014 WL 627133
2014 Pa. LEXIS 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that general discovery requests are insufficient, and requiring the [J-91-2015] - 8 requester to identify specific documents or items
stating that “[a]n order is separable from the main cause of action if it can be resolved without an analysis of the underlying dispute.”
providing that general discovery requests are insufficient, and requiring the requester to identify specific documents or items
stating that “the collateral order doctrine is to be narrowly construed in order to buttress the final order doctrine”
stating that “the collateral order doctrine is to be narrowly construed in order to buttress the final order doctrine”
stating that “the [Supreme] Court has generally viewed discovery orders implicating claims of privilege or work product to be appealable under Rule 313.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, Files, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.