Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/28/2013

Commonwealth v. Hernandez

Citations

79 A.3d 649
2013 Pa. Super. 243
2013 WL 4552447
2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to reach merits of appeal from untimely PCRA petition
holding that Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to reach merits of appeal from untimely PCRA petition
holding that Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to reach merits of appeal from untimely PCRA petition
concluding that the lower court correctly determined it was without jurisdiction to decide merits of untimely filed PCRA petition where Hernandez did not plead and prove any of the exceptions to the PCRA’s time-bar
holding appellant’s claim that his petition fits within Section 9545(b)(1)(iii) exception lacks merit because neither Lafler nor Frye created new constitutional right
finding no jurisdiction to hear an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because of an untimely PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Musmanno, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Hernandez

58 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.