Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hernandez

Citations

  • 783 A.2d 784
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 258
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Anders requires the Court to review issues that would normally be waived on appeal
  • concluding that Anders required the Court to examine the merits of Hernandez’s issues despite his counsel’s failure to file a court ordered 1925(b) statement
  • concluding that Anders requires review of issues otherwise waived on (Footnote Continued Next Page) -6- J-S19001-16 2009
  • holding that Anders requires the Court to review issues that would normally be waived on appeal
  • concluding that Anders requires that we examine the issues presented despite procedural defects
  • holding that, in order to rule upon Anders counsel’s petition to withdraw, we must examine the merits of the appellant’s discretionary sentencing claim, as raised in the Anders brief, despite Anders counsel’s failure to file a court-ordered Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh and Johnson, JJ. and Hester, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.