Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 8/14/2012

In re King

Citations

  • 697 F.3d 1189
  • 2012 WL 4498500
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[Lafler] and Frye do not announce new rules of constitutional law because they merely applied the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to a specific factual context”
  • “[W]e agree with the Eleventh Circuit’s determination in [Perez] that [Lafler] and Frye did not announce new rules of constitutional law because they merely applied the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to a specific factual context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Higginson, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.