Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 141 A.3d 491
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 73
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 193
  • 2016 WL 1178378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “when a petitioner files supplemental materials to a PCRA petition, and the PCRA court considers such materials, an attempt by the Commonwealth to preclude consideration of such materials fails” (cleaned up)
  • concluding that the petitioner failed to meet the newly-discovered evidence exception where he presented an affidavit containing a hearsay confession by a third-party, but failed to present any proof that the declarant was unavailable as a witness
  • holding that if a PCRA petitioner files an amendment to his petition without leave of court, but the PCRA court nonetheless addresses the arguments raised, the PCRA court has implicitly permitted the amendment and our review of the claim may proceed
  • holding that where a source merely provides a starting point for a defendant to investigate and discover additional sources of new facts, that source does not constitute a newly discovered fact but may simply lead a defendant to a newly discovered fact
  • noting that PCRA court implicitly permits amendment under Rule 905(A) when it does not strike supplement to PCRA petition and considers supplement when it addresses petitioner’s arguments
  • concluding the order denying the appellant’s -7- J-S15024-26 motion for recusal was not a final order; the appeal properly lies from the subsequent dismissal of the appellant’s PCRA petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Olson, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.