Skip to main content
· 9/10/2002

Commonwealth v. Fairiror

Citations

  • 809 A.2d 396
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 290
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a PCRA court has no jurisdiction to hear an untimely petition that does not plead any of the PCRA’s three timeliness exceptions
  • holding that, generally, “requests for reinstatement of appellate rights, including PCRA appellate rights,” are PCRA petitions that “must meet the timeliness requirements of the PCRA”
  • explaining that a petition seeking the restoration of PCRA appellate rights nunc pro tunc must be treated as a subsequent PCRA petition
  • noting that all requests for the reinstatement of appellate rights must be filed pursuant to the PCRA and meet the timeliness requirements of a PCRA petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lally-Green, Todd, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.