Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/13/2005

Commonwealth v. Berry

Citations

877 A.2d 479
2005 Pa. Super. 219
2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a challenge to the legality of sentence is never waived so long as the court has jurisdiction to address the claim
holding that a challenge to the legality of a sentence is never waived so long as a court has jurisdiction to address the claim
holding that a challenge to the legality of a sentence is never waived so long as a court has jurisdiction to address the claim
holding that legality of sentence claims may be addressed if the PCRA petition was timely filed
holding that a challenge to the legality of a sentence is never waived so long as a court has jurisdiction to address the claim
holding that a claim that the defendant was sentenced in violation of his plea agreement does not implicate the legality of his sentence, and that Berry’s challenge to his sentence on that basis was waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Joyce, Stevens, Musmanno, Lally-Green, Todd, Klein, Bender, Bowes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Berry

41 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.