Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Furgess

Citations

  • 149 A.3d 90
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 219
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 554
  • 2016 WL 5416640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Miller did not apply to PCRA petitioner who was 19 at time of his offense
  • holding that “petitioners who were older than 18 at the time they committed murder are not within the ambit of the Miller decision”
  • holding that a defendant beyond his eighteenth birthday when he murdered the victim cannot invoke Miller as a time-bar exception
  • holding that Miller does not apply to defendants who were over the age of 18 at the time of their offense
  • holding that “petitioners who were older than 18 at the time they committed murder are not within the ambit of the Miller decision”
  • holding that Furgess, who was 19 at the time of the murder could not rely on Miller “to bring [himself] within the time-bar exception in Section 9545(b)(1)(iii)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stabile, Solano, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.