Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/21/2012

Missouri v. Frye

Citations

  • 132 S. Ct. 1399
  • 182 L. Ed. 2d 379
  • 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2321
  • 566 U.S. 134

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that plea negotiations are a “critical point” in the course of a criminal proceeding where effective assistance of counsel is required
  • recognizing that Hill “established” that Strickland applies to ineffectiveness claims in the plea bargaining context
  • concluding that defendant had not established prejudice because of “strong reason to doubt the prosecution and the trial court would have permitted the plea bargain to become final”
  • recognizing that “[n]inety- seven percent of federal convictions and ninety-four percent of state convictions are the result of guilty pleas”
  • holding that defense counsel has a duty to convey and explain all plea offers extended by the prosecution
  • holding that “as a general rule, defense counsel has the duty to communicate formal offers from the prosecution to accept a plea” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

911 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Missouri v. Frye

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.