Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/20/2000

Commonwealth v. Glass

Citations

754 A.2d 655
562 Pa. 187
2000 Pa. LEXIS 1523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Article I, § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution does not categorically prohibit anticipatory search warrants
holding that anticipatory search warrants pose no threat to settled views of probable cause and ensure independent pre-search review by a neutral magistrate, while at the same time providing police with the ability to respond quickly to ongoing criminality
holding that anticipatory search warrants pose no threat to settled views of probable cause and ensure independent pre-search review by a neutral magistrate, while at the same time providing police with the ability to respond quickly to ongoing criminality
stating that “ ‘as time passes and it becomes possible for facts and circumstances to change, a redetermination of probable cause is required’ ”
noting that the proper standard to apply is probable cause consistent with Gates, supra and Gray, supra
recognizing warrant requirement of Article I, Section 8 “furthers the concern for privacy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, C.J., and Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman and Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.