Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gray

Citations

  • 503 A.2d 921
  • 509 Pa. 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • relying on Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • relying on Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 [103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527] (1983)
  • relying on Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 [103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527] (1983)
  • adopting the Gates analysis under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
  • adopting the Gates analysis under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos, Flaherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

159 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Gray

92 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.