United States v. Jimmy Lee Nixon, Richard Nixon, Michael Parks, Emmitt Lamar Manns, Henry L. Manns, Michael Keeley, Gerald Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirement of exigent circumstances is satisfied by the ready mobility inherent in all automobiles that reasonably appear to be capable of functioning
• declining to resolve whether plain error applies when a defendant fails to raise a Napue objection in the district court
• “[T]he practical nature of the magistrate’s decision justifies . . . upon review . . . upholding the magistrate’s findings even in marginal or doubtful cases.”
• failure to object to use of term \conspiracy\ by expert witness when elicited on cross examination rendered complaint about later use of term reviewable under plain error standard
• officer's use of \conspiracy\ factual, not legal determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).