United States v. James John Dornhofer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he fact that [a defendant] had a notebook containing pictures of nude children, [and] novels dealing with incest ... makes [the defendant’s] claim that he ordered the child pornography by mistake less probable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).