Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Haynes

Citations

  • 116 A.3d 640
  • 2015 Pa. Super. 94
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 207
  • 2015 WL 1814017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the history of Article 1, Section 8, and its differences and similarities to the Fourth Amendment
  • discussing the history of Article 1, Section 8, and its differences and similarities to the Fourth Amendment
  • discussing the history of Article 1, Section 8, and its differences and similarities to the Fourth Amendment
  • “Generally, when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court must consider all the evidence from trial, “even improperly-admitted evidence.”
  • “there was no common law authority for a warrantless search in a home, other than a search for the fleeing individual or of an individuars person incident, to an arrest.”
  • discussing historical underpinnings of warrantless search and seizure law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.