Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Citations

  • 86 A.3d 182
  • 624 Pa. 325
  • 2014 WL 619896
  • 2014 Pa. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence obtained following arrest based upon invalid arrest warrant must be suppressed despite officer’s belief that the warrant was valid
  • recognizing that Pennsylvania’s exclusionary rule “not only serve[s] the same privacy-based function it was deemed to serve in Edmunds, but also … serve[s] some generalized deterrence function”
  • holding trial court properly suppressed physical evidence seized by police incident to arrest based solely on invalid, expired arrest warrant
  • rejecting good faith exception for trooper relying on incorrect computer report that appellant had an active arrest warrant
  • declining to apply the good-faith exception to allow introduction of evidence seized pursuant to an arrest made on an invalid warrant
  • declining to apply the good-faith exception to allow introduction of evidence seized pursuant to an arrest made on an invalid warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.