United States v. Susan D. Bieri, United States of America v. Leonard Bieri, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “nonfundamental” Rule 41 violations, where there is neither prejudice nor reckless disregard, do not require suppression
• holding that even if tribal law was violated, suppression was not required because “the tribal law violation did not affect the constitutionality of the stop and search”
• holding defendant “did not suffer any prejudice” merely because officers failed to provide him with an attachment listing property to be seized
• refusing to “decide whether the warrant violated Missouri law since [the court] conclude[d] the district court did not err in finding the search warrant was constitutionally valid”
• refusing to “decide whether the warrant violated Missouri law since [the court] conclude[d] the district court did not err in finding the search warrant was constitutionally valid”
• \A search conducted with significant involvement of federal officers must comply with federal law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).