Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/29/2002

Cobb v. State

Citations

85 S.W.3d 258
2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 111
2002 WL 1059741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Fourth Amendment was not implicated when private citizen took knives from his son’s apartment
holding that trial court erred in admitting five knives, none of which were murder weapon knife, during guilt phase of trial
holding that Fourth Amendment was not implicated when private citizen took knives from his son’s apartment
explaining that the Fifth Amendment and the Miranda decision guard “against coercive custodial questioning by police[,]” therefore protecting defendants “from the possibility of physical or psychological ‘third degree’ procedures”
explaining that the Fifth Amendment and the Miranda decision guard “against coercive custodial questioning by police [,]” therefore protecting defendants “from the possibility of physical or psychological ‘third degree’ procedures”
explaining that the Fifth Amendment and the Miranda decision guard A against coercive custodial questioning by police [,] @ therefore protecting defendants A from the possibility of physical or psychological > third degree = procedures @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Hervey, Holcomb, Price, Johnson, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.