Court of Appeals of Texas· 8/23/2007
State v. Cox
Citations
- 235 S.W.3d 283
- 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 6829
- 2007 WL 2405125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “precedent requires that an order be in writing”
- concerning findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding suppression
- concerning findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding suppression
- concerning findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding suppression
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John Cayce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Texas v. Sanavongxay, SoutchayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-01-25· cited 112×
- Suzanne Kearns Dewalt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-11-07· cited 57×
- Dahlem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-07-15· cited 49×
- Bracken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-01-15· cited 41×
- State v. Miguel MartinezTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2018-04-12· cited 8×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2013-04-18· cited 7×
- State v. SanavongxayTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-12-02· cited 3×
- Ex Parte Alex PerezTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-08-21
- Ex Parte Alex PerezTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-09-09
- Brian Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-11-20
- Wesley L. Lee v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-02-19
- Robert David Bracken v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-01-15
- Kevin Mead AKA Richard Alan Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-05-20
- State v. Penny Rae SageTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-08-27
- State v. Jacob Allan BoschTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-08-27
- Michael Alexander v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-07-18
- Ex Parte Alex PerezTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-07-29
- Ex Parte Robert Randall LongTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-06-24
- Cheyenne Pate v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2010-03-10
- Ex Parte Rogelio Rincon, Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-05-08
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 4,288×
- Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 3,610×
- Slaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-09· cited 2,852×
- State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-28· cited 924×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-11-05· cited 905×
- Rodarte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-09· cited 493×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-25· cited 356×
- Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-07-01· cited 334×
- Gearing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-13· cited 207×
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-29· cited 143×
- State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-30· cited 133×
- State Ex Rel. Sutton v. BageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-15· cited 105×
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-01-31· cited 101×
- State v. GarzaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-11· cited 96×
- State v. ShawTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1999-10-11· cited 76×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-24· cited 69×
- Ex Parte WileyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-05· cited 58×
- Hall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-04-08· cited 53×
- Reyes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1995-09-25· cited 50×
- In Re HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2007-02-15· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.